Study of the Iranian nuclear file and its impacts of regional and international
Provided
A file or did not raise the issue of international debate as raised by the issue of Iran's nuclear ... While condemning the West Bnowi Iran and convene conferences after the other to discuss the issue, the outcome of the decisions are almost nonexistent, but from some form of economic boycott, and while we feel with regional Arab states of Iran threat to the future of the region as a whole, from a supported Tehran efforts and supports their access to nuclear-oriented grounds that Israel .. With the advance of Tehran in its nuclear program, day after day, the Iranian nuclear threat casts its effects on the entire region.
Intent. That the purpose of this study is benefited from the lesson Iranian perpetuated Alnowy area or waiting for the result
The origins and history of a nuclear Iran
After the fall of the Shah's regime in Iran stops its nuclear program which was initiated by the Shah in the late fifties of the last century from 1979 to 1984 as a result of the Iraq war - Iran (1980-1988).
One of the first priorities of the State of Iran after the Iran-Iraq war ended, the search for previous contracts with European countries to build nuclear reactors for generating electric power.
Rafsanjani's government believes that the generation of electric power is the basis to restart the plant closed since the time of the Shah after upgrading to rebuild Iran.
With the start of the feeling that Iraq's nuclear capabilities were taking the time to rise and the emergence of Iran's allies such as China and North Korea, Libya and Syria as players are important in providing arms to Iran, affecting supplies and quality, encouraged these things to Iran to return its nuclear program, was the first initiative to re-repair and rehabilitation of the Bushehr reactors followed by in the late eighties the emergence of many exporters and their collaborators in the nuclear field with Iran.
Perhaps the most impact nuclear cooperation agreements, which are the two conventions concluded by Iran with both China and Pakistan (1987 and 1990) and including the training of personnel and exchange of experiences. In the framework of the China contract included providing Iran with reactor neutrons (MNSR) the capacity of 27 kilowatts, and two reactors type \ 'Konishan \' capacity of 300 kilowatts. I thought the Western intelligence community that Pakistan, which possessed nuclear weapons in 1986, Iran provided valuable nuclear assistance including training of Iranian scientists in the field of plutonium in research enrichment using lasers and has been training in the laboratories of Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan (Kahuta), where research has been enriched and the installation of the bomb.
During this period showed the Soviet Union, interest in nuclear cooperation with Iran. In 1990, began talks with them to complete the Bushehr reactors and to provide more reactors.
The Russian Government has released officially in January 1995 it will complete the construction and rehabilitation of the Bushehr reactors and build three more reactors at the same location. Since this date, and the United States show the object after the other on the Russian deal and that it would provide Iran with technical knowledge to bolster the firepower of the project. In spite of the emergence of several problems caused by lack of harmonization of technical equipment with those German Russian
In 1995 it was clear, from the American point of view, that Iran would try to acquire nuclear weapons in another way, through the purchase of dual-use materials from Western sources and destinations. And increased fear of the possibility of making the means of local (Kalt_khasib centrifuge) to produce bomb fuel.
Start-up international suspicions
In mid-2002 revealed an opposition group based in France (National Council of Resistance of Iran NCRI) the existence of two secret installations to enrich uranium at the site \ 'Natanz \' and the heavy water plant in the \ 'Arak \' after the discovery of reserves of raw uranium Sajjad (Yazd Province ) Iran announced it would develop the use of a small nuclear reactor depends on the sources and of the self. These two events have knocked the alarm among Western intelligence and policy, Valt_khasib and production of heavy water, and extracting nuclear fuel from local sources, means that this same concept will contribute actively to the development of domestic fuel cycle and then a nuclear weapon at a later time.
After the signing of the protocol that gave the Agency the right of special inspection considered Iran as a cooperating agency, but not at all.
On June 18, 2004, Members of Board of Trustees of the IAEA, Iran should notice that it does not provide full support to the Protocol, especially after the postponement of the visit of a delegation from the Agency for a number of sites P2 centrifuges, and failing to deliver the plans and designs of these devices and the results of research conducted over the transfer and testing of nuclear materials.
As a result, the Agency requested Iran to be \ 'collaborators \' in the implementation of the Protocol to solve existing problems between them, including the issue of contamination of the high-low enriched uranium centrifuge enrichment (which Iran was justified that the cause of contamination of imported machinery parts), and control the production of plutonium 210.
In December 2004 that enables the IAEA inspectors access to Iranian military sites and two Bargain Lavizan. It was found that the signatories Ma'daan to test conventional explosives and the number of storage and materials transferred to them from other sites had been classified as being of the nature of nuclear weapons.
In March 2005, Iran rejected the second visit to the site Bargain by IAEA inspectors on the basis that it is not justified.
This prompted the agency to say that this rejection of the International Organization malfunction effort in the investigation of the centrifuge and a source of highly enriched uranium contamination, which revealed in one of the sites, did not show Thalelhm five other sites in anything reason to doubt.
In August 2005, the Iranian authorities to lift the IAEA seals and means of control at the nuclear facilities are believed to be working with the centrifuge enrichment in the political attempt to head off any foreign intervention continued without limits in the draft is not without ambition, but he is still in its infancy, and in its infancy.
Convert the Iranian nuclear file to the Security Council.
In early 2006, Iran rejected the Russian proposal in the transfer of uranium enrichment to Russian territory to ensure that the Iranians do not resort to use it for manufacturing a nuclear weapon and Iran's refusal was met with agreement of views in the European and American support of Russia and China on the need to stop Iran's nuclear program completely, and then united positions The decision of the International Board of Governors of the IAEA to refer the Iranian nuclear dossier to the Security Council without taking punitive measures at this stage, where he still comes to uncertainty in the nature of the program, so Iran is in the range of possible sanctions unless it complied with the requests to the list of issues contained in resolution Board of Governors of the IAEA.
During the last three years of 2006, Iran has been playing on the element of gain time with repeating the official continued by the leaders of Iran to the Iranian nuclear program will not stop under any circumstances, regardless of the penalties, and that was intended to serve the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy.
The Iranian nuclear threat and the nuclear threat of Zionism.
The form of Iran's announcement that it had entered an advanced stage in its pursuit of nuclear energy for peaceful uses, and West suspects it is a move to acquire nuclear weapons, the form of confusing the Arab reaction, both at the grassroots level or at the official level.
There is a large public sector in the Arab world, along with writers and intellectuals, believes that Iran has the right to possess nuclear weapons, because in addition to the power of the Muslims, through which can neutralize the potential and capabilities of the enemy, led by the potential of the Zionist enemy.
And supports these Iranian position on the grounds that Iran is an Islamic state, why not allow it to possess nuclear weapons, at a time is allowed for the Zionist state to possess a nuclear arsenal, threatening Arabs and Muslims.
They believe that the Iranian nuclear bomb will scare the Zionists, and will the balance of power in the Arab region, and will make the Zionists think twice before targeting inside the Palestinian and Lebanese or any Arab state.
They say that Iran has the predetermined positions in support of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad with money and weapons, as well as supporting Hezbollah in its conflict with the Zionists, why Ncetkther it has to be a nuclear bomb in the interest of Arab and Islamic issues.
They have built their position on the basis that all that is against the Zionist entity, they support him and support him and stand next to it, because any success for Iran would be considered against the potential of the sons of Zion and Ewalehm and supported by all forms of support.
To this we say that not just slogans and bustle Dzalp sentences construction, do not pay attention to those who threaten our security and enter into agreements with the Americans in a historic deal at our expense and at the expense of our issues of security. And give to those Iranian stance of what is happening in Iraq, where no longer a secret unlimited support provided by the Iranians to Iraqi Shiites against Sunnis.
Most, if not all, of Iraq's Shiite militias that slaughtered the people of the year so far more than a hundred thousand are founded in Iran, Iranian-trained, and armed with Iranian financing and financed by Iran.
And give to those ed analysis published in leading newspapers around the world, emphasizing that the southern Iraq, populated by Shiites, has become a breeding ground and ****ter for tens of thousands of Iranian intelligence operatives.
And give to those also exposed by the sober analysis of Iran and the objectives of the Shiites of Iraq in the establishment of a Shiite crescent, which begins from Iran, goes to Iraq, and Lebanon, and related one way or another the Shiites in the Gulf states.
"We say to them, too dangerous role played by Iran in Iraq now is a model of what can be for many of the neighboring Arab countries and remote areas.
And tell them also said that Iran - if successful nuclear - will accept nothing less than to be a key figure in the Palestinian issue, Iraq and Lebanon and a key player in the equations of the whole region from Tetouan in the west to Basra in the east.
The goal of the Iranian nuclear is not Israel, but to impose themselves on the region by force, which also convert the Arab countries to just small objects orbiting around the disciplined movement of the Iranian orbit, which is unlikely to take a confrontational path with Israel's orbit.
In this direction, there are writers and analysts believed that Iranian nuclear threat may become greater than the Zionist nuclear threat to Arab national security, for reasons that might include the belief that the conflict with Israel has been drawn under which if not resolved, in fact, and the political equation stable in Tel Aviv, while the files did not find the Iranian Arabic complex way to solve, any problem of the three UAE islands and the problems generated by the new Iraqi situation.