عرض مشاركة واحدة

قديم 31-10-09, 02:37 PM

  رقم المشاركة : 4
معلومات العضو
المنتصر
مشرف عام

الصورة الرمزية المنتصر

إحصائية العضو





المنتصر غير متواجد حالياً

رسالتي للجميع

افتراضي



 

US-Iranian relations .. Try to understand


American world filled with noise about the danger of the Iranian nuclear project and the need to stop the program by letting Tehran from building a nuclear bomb, and recently, the former U.S. president (Bush) has put Iran in the axis of evil. At the same time note the significant cooperation between the Iranian administration and the American administration in many of the files, was cooperation in the war on Iraq and Afghanistan, acknowledged the two sides.



There is no doubt that one of the most important dilemmas in the region are exploring the Iranian-American relationship and the origin of the ambiguity in this relationship is the approaches that attempt to dive into the depths of that relationship to interpret and devise laws and Sunnah that control in this relationship there are many indications that there is a consensus between Iran and America .



In terms of intellectual background that drives both the Iranian and American parties in all aspects of the Arab region, we find no difference in antagonism or points of view, Vkltehma Tknan malice against the Arab nation in one form or another, and both have ambitions in Iraq and other Arab countries, even if they differed Mcharbhma , adjective Iranian ambitions to dominate the intellectual capacity is its desire to impose Safavid Shiism, which is a combination of national and religious Persian Magi.



The United States has other projects are intellectually they came to the region is the dominance of cultural, economic and military on the so called Greater Middle East.



So there are points of convergence between Iran and the United States in all matters relating to the region, and this convergence is not an interim, but for some vital goals for both long-term based on the principles and understandings and clear.



But if there is a consensus in Iran says this hypothesis How do we explain U.S. moves against Iranian nuclear issue?



Najib that these movements serve to deceive the American regional and international parties to obtain the gains for both parties.



1 Vizaar a state of hostility between Iran and America fooling some Arab countries, especially the Gulf states, Egypt and making them more in order to continue the alliance with the United States and the survival of military bases in the Middle East.



2 The persistence of hostility declared between Iran and America makes the region ablaze and raise the level of tension and makes the major industrialized countries such as Germany, France, Japan and China closer to America to protect its economic interests in the region and ensure the flow of oil to the factories and their economy.



3 We do not need a large debate to arrive at that Iran is a country with regional ambitions in the process of trying to do what they can, they cooperated, and reiterates its readiness for more of it, with the major powers, especially America, until it achieves international recognition of the regional role that you want.



4 as Iran seeks to demonstrate to America and Tadtha implied it vulnerable to championing issues, including of course the Palestinians to show the Arab countries as a regional power moving from the Department of the Palestinian cause; to provide a safe environment for a Zionist in Palestine, a strategic goal also of the USA Altmahdp America and Israel.



5 The United States considers to be held in alliance with Iran to ensure the loyalty of most of the Shia world, and they are ready to serve the higher national interests of the United States, compared with U.S. sponsorship and practical role in the Shi'ite control of the vital region, and he speak States believes that the Shiites are deployed throughout the the world, and the alliance with the millions means reduce the role of anti-fundamentalist Wahhabi and anti-American interests, and that the U.S. administration to invest dye historic animosity between the Wahhabi and Shiite ideology, although the vast majority of these millions of Shiite follow one man, and ensuring the support of this man (ie, the supreme leader of the Shia world) eventually means ensuring the Shi'ite world, in other words, ensuring the scientific position of the estate and its authority in Najaf, means in the end, ensuring the support of the majority of the world's Shia as well as the American position.



In spite of the compatibility between Americans and Iranians, and we have outlined in the previous points it is natural to grow stronger after the conflict between the two parties to share dominance, and competition for a greater share of the spoils and to weaken the influence of each other in the areas of influence.



The bottom line: that Iran continues to develop its nuclear program through a strategy of weaving the carpet, in the words of Mohammad Sadeq Al-Husseini any prolonged negotiations and keep the door open to take advantage of the time over Marginalia fake by the United States to impede the program.



It is expected by many observers to continue this case the period may be extended for two or three years until that Tehran from achieving what it wants.



In that equation it is clear that the Arab countries to rely on their capabilities and to clean up their differences and come to terms with their own people; because you do not rely on the American side against Iran Kahilv value added, or the countries that support Iran also Sishva to do so, if Iran's project reached its peak and was able Iran one morning to conduct its first nuclear test in the region.

 

 


المنتصر

يقول احد القادة القدماء وهويخاطب جنوده . ( اذا لم تكونوا مستعدين للقتال من أجل ما تروه عزيزاً عليكم , فسوف يأخذه أحد ما عاجلا أو اَجلا , واذا كنتم تفضلوا السلام على الحرية فسوف تخسرونهما معاً , واذا كنتم تفضلوا الراحة والرخاء والسلام على العدل والحرية فسوف تخسروهما جميعا ) .

   

رد مع اقتباس