[المنتصر]

Start-up international suspicions

In mid-2002 revealed an opposition group based in France (National Council of Resistance of Iran NCRI) the existence of two secret installations to enrich uranium at the site \ 'Natanz \' and the heavy water plant in the \ 'Arak \' after the discovery of reserves of raw uranium Sajjad (Yazd Province ) Iran announced it would develop the use of a small nuclear reactor depends on the sources and of the self. These two events have knocked the alarm among Western intelligence and policy, Valt_khasib and production of heavy water, and extracting nuclear fuel from local sources, means that this same concept will contribute actively to the development of domestic fuel cycle and then a nuclear weapon at a later time.

After the signing of the protocol that gave the Agency the right of special inspection considered Iran as a cooperating agency, but not at all.

On June 18, 2004, Members of Board of Trustees of the IAEA, Iran should notice that it does not provide full support to the Protocol, especially after the postponement of the visit of a delegation from the Agency for a number of sites P2 centrifuges, and failing to deliver the plans and designs of these devices and the results of research conducted over the transfer and testing of nuclear materials.

As a result, the Agency requested Iran to be \ 'collaborators \' in the implementation of the Protocol to solve existing problems between them, including the issue of contamination of the high-low enriched uranium centrifuge enrichment (which Iran was justified that the cause of contamination of imported machinery parts), and control the production of plutonium 210.

In December 2004 that enables the IAEA inspectors access to Iranian military sites and two Bargain Lavizan. It was found that the signatories Ma'daan to test conventional explosives and the number of storage and materials transferred to them from other sites had been classified as being of the nature of nuclear weapons.

In March 2005, Iran rejected the second visit to the site Bargain by IAEA inspectors on the basis that it is not justified.

This prompted the agency to say that this rejection of the International Organization malfunction effort in the investigation of the centrifuge and a source of highly enriched uranium contamination, which revealed in one of the sites, did not show Thalelhm five other sites in anything reason to doubt.

In August 2005, the Iranian authorities to lift the IAEA seals and means of control at the nuclear facilities are believed to be working with the centrifuge enrichment in the political attempt to head off any foreign intervention continued without limits in the draft is not without ambition, but he is still in its infancy, and in its infancy.

Convert the Iranian nuclear file to the Security Council.

In early 2006, Iran rejected the Russian proposal in the transfer of uranium enrichment to Russian territory to ensure that the Iranians do not resort to use it for manufacturing a nuclear weapon and Iran's refusal was met with agreement of views in the European and American support of Russia and China on the need to stop Iran's nuclear program completely, and then united positions The decision of the International Board of Governors of the IAEA to refer the Iranian nuclear dossier to the Security Council without taking punitive measures at this stage, where he still comes to uncertainty in the nature of the program, so Iran is in the range of possible sanctions unless it complied with the requests to the list of issues contained in resolution Board of Governors of the IAEA.

During the last three years of 2006, Iran has been playing on the element of gain time with repeating the official continued by the leaders of Iran to the Iranian nuclear program will not stop under any circumstances, regardless of the penalties, and that was intended to serve the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy.

The Iranian nuclear threat and the nuclear threat of Zionism.

The form of Iran's announcement that it had entered an advanced stage in its pursuit of nuclear energy for peaceful uses, and West suspects it is a move to acquire nuclear weapons, the form of confusing the Arab reaction, both at the grassroots level or at the official level.

There is a large public sector in the Arab world, along with writers and intellectuals, believes that Iran has the right to possess nuclear weapons, because in addition to the power of the Muslims, through which can neutralize the potential and capabilities of the enemy, led by the potential of the Zionist enemy.

And supports these Iranian position on the grounds that Iran is an Islamic state, why not allow it to possess nuclear weapons, at a time is allowed for the Zionist state to possess a nuclear arsenal, threatening Arabs and Muslims.

They believe that the Iranian nuclear bomb will scare the Zionists, and will the balance of power in the Arab region, and will make the Zionists think twice before targeting inside the Palestinian and Lebanese or any Arab state.

They say that Iran has the predetermined positions in support of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad with money and weapons, as well as supporting Hezbollah in its conflict with the Zionists, why Ncetkther it has to be a nuclear bomb in the interest of Arab and Islamic issues.

They have built their position on the basis that all that is against the Zionist entity, they support him and support him and stand next to it, because any success for Iran would be considered against the potential of the sons of Zion and Ewalehm and supported by all forms of support.

To this we say that not just slogans and bustle Dzalp sentences construction, do not pay attention to those who threaten our security and enter into agreements with the Americans in a historic deal at our expense and at the expense of our issues of security. And give to those Iranian stance of what is happening in Iraq, where no longer a secret unlimited support provided by the Iranians to Iraqi Shiites against Sunnis.

Most, if not all, of Iraq's Shiite militias that slaughtered the people of the year so far more than a hundred thousand are founded in Iran, Iranian-trained, and armed with Iranian financing and financed by Iran.

And give to those ed analysis published in leading newspapers around the world, emphasizing that the southern Iraq, populated by Shiites, has become a breeding ground and ter for tens of thousands of Iranian intelligence operatives.

And give to those also exposed by the sober analysis of Iran and the objectives of the Shiites of Iraq in the establishment of a Shiite crescent, which begins from Iran, goes to Iraq, and Lebanon, and related one way or another the Shiites in the Gulf states.

"We say to them, too dangerous role played by Iran in Iraq now is a model of what can be for many of the neighboring Arab countries and remote areas.

And tell them also said that Iran - if successful nuclear - will accept nothing less than to be a key figure in the Palestinian issue, Iraq and Lebanon and a key player in the equations of the whole region from Tetouan in the west to Basra in the east.

The goal of the Iranian nuclear is not Israel, but to impose themselves on the region by force, which also convert the Arab countries to just small objects orbiting around the disciplined movement of the Iranian orbit, which is unlikely to take a confrontational path with Israel's orbit.

In this direction, there are writers and analysts believed that Iranian nuclear threat may become greater than the Zionist nuclear threat to Arab national security, for reasons that might include the belief that the conflict with Israel has been drawn under which if not resolved, in fact, and the political equation stable in Tel Aviv, while the files did not find the Iranian Arabic complex way to solve, any problem of the three UAE islands and the problems generated by the new Iraqi situation.

Change the Arab position on nuclear disarmament

In the opinion of the majority in the Arab street that the Arabs should have the nuclear project, nuclear deter the Zionist project, and bind his hands to shed Arab land and Arab blood has been shed by the rivers of these Zionists.

But there is another sector does not see a significant Arab nuclear project that is expected should be in the base to deter Iran's new nuclear challenge, after Iran confirmed its behavior in Iraq to have a large Otmaa in Arab countries, not less than the Zionist ambitions, if not superior .

The question of ownership of the weapon the Arabs advanced, and from nuclear weapons, of course, the question of human beings by many Arab intellectuals after the end of the colonial era, and openness to the West, and contact with Western culture. They decided that the distance between Muslims and the West explain the disparity in the size and quality of the technical capabilities of war and inequality is not cultural or lumpy, and then the reform needed is the pursuit of such high-tech industries.

After the occupation of Palestine and the Arab-Israeli conflict, the theory of national security systems of revolutionary nationalism elaborated on this concept itself.

But with the change management strategy of the conflict with Israel, which has become gambling on a peace settlement with the Jewish state to extract part of the usurped rights in the framework of a deal \ "land for peace, \" which turned out to deal \ "full normalization in return for full withdrawal \", the theory is traditional claim ownership of advanced military technology started to weaken in the face of theories that are not in favor of it. Also began to talk about the fear of Iran's nuclear program is greater than the fear of Israeli nuclear program.

Some do not favor nuclear

But some intellectuals and analysts do not favor the scramble of arms, and from nuclear weapons, for many considerations that the military industry remains fragile and have limited impact if not based on the structure of industrial technology in full production system based on firm scientific and technical. Without this structure, the military industry to become mere tools are extracted from the substantive con****, it is often a fragile development of weapons of imported, high costs strain national economies are weak, to reinforce the position of the military in the political field, leading to the closure of ports of political openness on the pre**** of defending the security national security.

It is also that these considerations can not be reduced national security requirements of military technologies, but these tools are not only limited by the requirements of this security, which includes a central pillars such as the effectiveness of the political system and the solidity of its legitimacy, and the level of social and economic growth, and the production system of scientific and technical support.

Iran as a regional

This has led Iran having the technology to produce nuclear energy to move Iran from the regional States slice medium strength to what might be called the super regional force, which requires research in the Arab point of view toward this new situation in the region, and how to deal with the country's major regional the region.

It must be recognized that the Arab vision of being the Iranian unambiguous and blurred to a large extent, due to various considerations, most notably the apparent disparity between the national accounts and nationalism, not Arab in dealing with Iran and by, but in dealing with Arab issues and topics related parties of the utmost importance for the Arab States, individually and collectively .

The Arab management of the relationship with Iran, launched mainly from the vision and the accounts of each country to their interests and objectives and balances with Iran unilaterally, and not out of a collective, based framework of reference and the Arab governor of the line of that relationship.

Call Amr Moussa

The call of the Secretary General Amr Moussa of the Arab League Summit during the eighteenth to the Arabs in Khartoum to enter the nuclear club for peaceful purposes in a timely and reflect the need for urgent and essential requirement, but must also work on the Arabs to possess nuclear weapons like North Korea and \ "Israel \ "The other countries where it has no value or weight of the Arabs without nuclear weapons.

Arabs now have no word and no one hears their voice or take into account their positions and no one cares that they with or is just a sample Schtoa is no difference between this and that they must eventually bow and do what they dictate and be subject in all cases to apply and absolutely everything is report rather than be a party to the decision-making in international organizations and forums.

Despite the fact that Arabs are given the numerical strength of being distributed to 22 countries and are 280 million people, but this did not satisfy the large number of them did not put them in the position of considering allowing them to challenge and confrontation, rejection, and attitudes hot and pragmatic decisions bold and break the cycle of condemnation and denunciation and the like.

Let us look at North Korea, which possesses nuclear weapons, no one dares to touch them or provoke, and even if somebody dares to open the door to dialogue with them, it would be respected and where North Korea in a position of strength speak the language of Peer-to-peer and impose conditions and rejects everything you see inappropriate to them. The United States tried repeatedly to force Korea to abandon its nuclear program but did not find the sense that America could not do anything to keep North Korea applies its domestic policies freely and continue its nuclear program, without concern or fear.

Let us look also to Israel and how to deal with the whole world and the Arabs, especially with all the arrogance, arrogant and condescending, a trampling on the UN resolutions and all laws hit the wall, applying as it deems appropriate to them, and no one dares to injured feelings or later reprimanded if they are wrong, why all this? Because it simply has nuclear weapons, which gave it a special power that no one of its neighbors in the Middle East in general has such a weapon.

So here are aware that possession of nuclear weapons has become an urgent need for the Arabs and is a must today before tomorrow so keep abreast of international developments particularly serious that the Arabs have all the possibilities that will allow them to do the most important of money and mind and nothing stands in the face of the Arabs to enter the nuclear club but to take practical steps and give from fear and hesitation to raise the head and the Arab citizen is self-confidence and pride in belonging to the Arab ranks.

The impact of the Iranian nuclear program on the Arabian Gulf region

Arab positions differ on the best ways to deal with the Iranian nuclear issue between those who supported the U.S. approach is apparent whether or inwardly, and the sufficiency of tendency to silence and control, and those who believed the right of Iranians to develop their program, and in general the situation stood at the borders of the official Arab position is says goes beyond the need to make (the Middle East a zone free of weapons of mass destruction

It may have seemed the situation in the eyes of some reassurance that the results of the pursuit of America will lead to the deletion of the Iranian nuclear program even if military force, which means that the Arabs would not be effective in the conflict and the result is no need to adopt a hostile attitude towards him as long as U.S. and international position on this case.

Due to differences in Arab attitudes over the disparity in the perception of risk that can be achieved by the Iranian nuclear program and its impact on the Arab region as a whole and particularly the Gulf, where the effects can be extended to be caused by Iran's nuclear program to the Gulf region is larger than the other Arab countries such threats: